VIOLENT PHILOSOPHY

In collective ideologies violence is always prevalent, why?

Because violence in their minds is not a flaw, it is the 'spirit' that energizes it.

A TRUMPET CALL

I post a short comment from the Spectator because it sums up the weakness of Australian politics. 

Even commentators I respect on the Australian 'right' are whingeing about Trump being too harsh, being a bully, not treating others with the respect they deserve and in particular the Ukraine...which in my opinion shows that they do not do much homework on Putin's reasons for his invasion. And by the way, Putin did not try to force me to take an experimental drug my own government did that by threatening my ability to make a living, to meet with friends and family and a host of other indignities. Putin is not threatening my freedom to speak and to live freely as a Christian my own government is doing that. One look at Europe and we no longer see a culture that is our friend nor who hold to our values.

Watching the Australian news illustrates how weak the justice system, economics, education systems are...everything is tainted by the same weaknesses and ideological corruption we see on display in Europe. 

Trump is a disrupter. He is tearing down decades of corruption and indecision, he is rattling cages and though I run the risk of misdirection, I believe he is an instrument being used to give us all a second chance: 

"On Saturday, Labor won the WA election in a third consecutive landslide. The Liberals ran a bland no-risk campaign and, unsurprisingly, barely troubled the scorers in terms of increased lower house MPs. Worse, the result suggests the federal Liberals are not likely to win enough of the WA seats they’re banking on to get over the line in May. Meanwhile, Newspoll has confirmed what your scribe has worried about for the past year: Peter Dutton’s Coalition is failing to convince voters it is ready to return to government, even though those same voters don’t believe the Albanese government deserves re-election."[Speccie 11.3.25]

We need a powerful and disruptive force in Australia to tear down the strongholds that have been established over decades...until then I fear we will wither and die and maybe our children will have to fight a war of freedom like America in 1776.

REACTIONARY FOOLS

Think about how the various sides of politics act. The left is incensed about DOGE and it's exposing of government graft over decades and trying to defeat rule by an unelected bureaucracy. Fair enough, it is going to be controversial. 

But...we currently see Tesla dealerships bombed, shot at, and set on fire. Where have we seen such reactions before? 

The last time Trump was elected there were months and months of riots, and when a black drug addict was killed by an overdose but in between his collapse and death had a police officer kneel (stupidly) on his neck, the reaction to this was billions of dollars lost in burnings, wrecking whole neighbourhoods, rioting, and murders, plus many of these actions continue today. 

When are people going to wake up to the reality that the left side of politics in the world we live today, are lunatics?

BABIES, BESTIALITY AND THE MORALITY OF BAPHOMET!

I was looking for some information on the Encyclopaedia Britannica network and I spotted this section: "Ethics, philosophy. 

• Also known as: moral philosophy:
• Written by Peter Singer
• Fact-checked by Editors of the Encyclopaedia Britannica
• Last Updated: Feb 13, 2025 • Article History"

If you are unfamiliar with who Peter Singer is, I refer you to, in brief: 

"Peter Singer is the atheist utilitarian philosopher who is full on about animal rights,and is a committed vegetarian. He has even written serious articles informing us that there is really nothing wrong with bestiality. For this bioethicist, the golden rule seems to be this: feel free to have sex with animals as long as you don’t eat them afterwards.

And Singer has explicitly stated that the newborn have no inherent right to life, but must earn that right if they pass various tests for personhood which he has laid out. He says it is unreasonable to expect the newborn to be classified as persons, and we should not automatically assume they have some basic right to keep living.

As he notoriously wrote with Helga Kuhse in the 1985 volume, Should the Baby Live?: “We do not think new-born infants have an inherent right to life”. Or as he wrote in a July 1983 edition of Pediatrics: “Species membership in Homo-sapiens is not morally relevant. If we compare a dog or a pig to a severely defective infant, we often find the non-human to have superior capacities.”(B Meuhlenberg)

That this fellow is the Britannica's choice to write on 'Ethics' speaks volumes about how careful we need to be about researching on the internet.

Solidifying the divide!

The divide is becoming very obvious. There is a clear and focussed division between those who want a 'global community' and those who want to maintain a distinctive culture.

Those who wish to globalise are trying every trick in the book to blur the differences between cultures; ergo the subversive 'diversity is our strength' meme. We who believe in a small government apparatus servicing the needs of an electorate pursuing the same or similar ends are becoming more and more alienated from the intellectual mainstream (unfortunately, often because of apathy regarding the 'ordinary' mainstream).

Therefore when we do manage a breakthrough, and gain a 'power base', we need to capitalise on that foundation and push through laws, rules and systems that support the ideals of small government as quickly as possible and ignore the bleating's and shrieking's of the 'other'. This is what is happening in America and Trump is leading the way.

We can only pray that there are those who have the same gumption hiding in the wings of Australian politics.

Gnostic Utopia

I am becoming more and more convinced that the 'spiritual influence' behind so much of post modern culture today is a form of religious Gnosticism. On one hand it explains the origins of the 'Love is Love' ideology as well as the ready acceptance of violence/war on the other. 

An easy introductory text on Gnostic principles is Derek Morphews book 'The Spiritual Spiderweb'. It provides an erudite and comprehensive understanding behind the 'strands' of thought running through so many 'worldviews' today, and even ominously, particular patterns of thought behind some church movements as well.[Romans 12:2]

THE DIFFERENCE IS BIG

Too many main-stream commentators rise up with a misplaced anger whenever the true barbarity of Hamas and Hezbollah is exposed. These leftist shills try to excuse the barbarism as 'legitimate payback' for years of oppression, or as tit-for-tat for some imagined persecution by Jewish 'occupiers'. Even a superficial evaluation of these claims reflects the paucity of reliability, not least the claim of a Palestinian 'occupancy' of the land as opposed to the 'recent colonisation' by Israel...who in reality have lived there for millennia with the receipts to prove it. Even the calling of the land 'Palestine' almost 2THOUSAND YEARS AGO was an insult to the then Jewish inhabitants of the land who were forced out by the Roman Emperor Hadrian.

Hamas and Hezbollah are certainly as barbaric as the Nazis ever were, given the video evidence of the attacks. However, the Nazis were ashamed of what they did, they tried to hide their deeds and in the case of Police reserve Battalion 101 they drank themselves into a stupor every night after 'work' because of their guilt. 

The evidence from Gaza shows something quite different. Videos captured from the perpetrators themselves shows young terrorists filming their gruesome handiwork in vivid detail and then phoning home to brag to their parents about how successful they were in killing the Jews and that they would never stop until they had eradicated every Jew from the face of the earth. 

This is a completely demonic display of hatred that can never be satisfied by a 'two state solution'.