Friday 30 November 2012

A Wolfe in Armani clothing

One of the reasons I keep my Tom Wolfe books on the shelf for repeated referrals:
Wolfe described his initial attempt to write the story as a cheap dismissal: “Don’t worry, these people are nothing.” He realized in California that he had been wrong. These people were something, and very influential within their own circles, which were far larger than anyone on the outside had hitherto noticed.
“Max Weber,” Wolfe tells me, “was the first to argue that social classes were dying everywhere—except, in his time, in England—and being replaced by what he called ‘status groups.’ ” The term improves in Wolfean English: “Southern California, I found, was a veritable paradise of statuspheres,” he wrote in 1968. Beyond the customizers and drag racers, there were surfers, cruisers, teenyboppers, beboppers, strippers, bikers, beats, heads, and, of course, hippies. Each sphere started off self-contained but increasingly encroached on, and influenced, the wider world.
“Practically every style recorded in art history is the result of the same thing—a lot of attention to form plus the money to make monuments to it,” Wolfe wrote in the introduction to his first book. “But throughout history, everywhere this kind of thing took place, China, Egypt, France under the Bourbons, every place, it has been something the aristocracy was responsible for. What has happened in the United States since World War II, however, has broken that pattern. The war created money. It made massive infusions of money into every level of society. Suddenly classes of people whose styles of life had been practically invisible had the money to build monuments to their own styles.” If Wolfe’s oeuvre has an overarching theme, this is it.

One of the 20th century's most perspicacious minds.
 

Thursday 29 November 2012

Hamas hubris

To those who believe that Hamas (the terrorist organisation) is merely another voice in the middle east muddle, take note of the public pronouncements by this organisation.
...most of the media coverage of the war was based on the noxious premise that there was a moral equivalence between Israel and Hamas, regardless of the fact that the latter is a proscribed terrorist organisation which seeks to achieve the extermination of Israel and every Jew.
This is what the Hamas put up on the screen during a music video last week on its al Aqsa TV station:
‘Killing Jews is worship that draws us close to Allah’.
Lyrics of songs on this video included these little ditties:
‘[Oh] lovers of the trigger: Killing the occupiers [Israelis] is worship that Allah made into law...’‘Brigades - we kidnap soldiers, Brigades - we kill Jews’            and
‘Repeat in the name of your Jihad: Death to Israel.
 
I would also recommend to all Christians to read the book Son of Hamas by Mosab Hassan Yousef...it is instructive.

Sargent Gilly

I know nuffing!

The cultural War of the Worlds!

Let us now agree to put aside politik-speak and start calling a spade a spade:
For what it illuminates is nothing less than our ongoing culture war, in which political correctness — which should really be called cultural Marxism — is being used by the Left to revolutionise society by undermining and subverting its core beliefs.
So, fundamental values embodied in issues such as immigration, national identity, marriage and family and many others are under systematic assault, while all who seek to defend them are vilified as bigots, swivel-eyed extremists and lunatics.
This has not been achieved by any one organisation imbued with mythical and conspiratorial powers. It has occurred over decades as a result of two main factors.
The first was the steady rise into power, across the universities, media, professions, political parties and civil service, of those whose opinions were shaped in the Sixties and Seventies by the New Left, which believed in the cultural transformation of society


This 'New Left' as Melanie Phillips describes them are, I believe, in equal parts a manifestation of Nietzsche's 'will to power' married to the neo-Marxist ideology of Antonio Gramsci.

Power is achieved by the 'long march through the institutions', where Western society is not conquered by physical revolution but by infiltrating and subverting the 'organs of education and culture' i.e. the Churches, schools, Universities, carriers of 'popular culture' (TV, Movies, documentaries etc) and most importantly the main-stream-media.

I make particular note of the infiltration of Churches and look with suspicion on ideologically driven philosophies such as; liberation theology, the 'social' gospel and seeker sensitive 'churches' to name but a few. The notable attack on approaching the gospel with any hint of intellectual examination (not bilical by the way) found in the average western church has resulted in the body of Christ being infiltrated by ideologies that most do not even know exist. Note how Paul describes how the god of this world has blinded the minds of people. (2 Cor 4:4)

If we read church history and in particular the philosophical attacks that occurred on the churches during the first century and the calibre of Christian who stood against these attacks, it is easy to see how far short we have fallen in this new age, the age touted to have produced the most 'educated' of generations.

Wednesday 28 November 2012

Honest to God!

From the mouth of a confused but endearingly honest unbeliever, the respected atheistic philosopher Thomas Nagel:
"I speak from experience, being strongly subject to this fear (of religion) myself: I want atheism to be true and am made uneasy by the fact that some of the most intelligent and well-informed people I know are religious believers. It isn’t just that I don’t believe in God and, naturally, hope that I’m right in my belief. It’s that I hope there is no God! I don’t want there to be a God; I don’t want the universe to be like that. My guess is that this cosmic authority problem is not a rare condition and it is responsible for much of the scientism and reductionism of our time. One of the tendencies it supports is the ludicrous overuse of evolutionary biology to explain everything about life, including everything about the human mind. Darwin enabled modern secular culture to heave a great collective sigh of relief, by apparently providing a way to eliminate purpose, meaning and design as fundamental features of the world."
 
He touches on a very common and perpetuating truth; most unbelievers do not want there to be a God. Christianity has not been tried and found wanting, it is that it has been thought too difficult and not tried at all.

Welcome to the 'new' age!

To those who advocate calm in the Middle East, i.e. politik speak  for Israel to 'withdraw from the 'occupied' territory', consider this:
But led by the Islamists in Iran and their proxies, over recent years Israel’s enemies have chosen the tactic of terrorism rather than invasion to achieve their ends. On occasion, as in Lebanon in 1982, Israel has responded by strategically occupying land to prevent such attacks. Each time it has given up such land — as in Gaza in 2005 — its withdrawal has been met with terror, not peace. Over recent years more than 12,000 rockets have been fired on Israel from Gaza.In the background of all this is an Iranian regime which has as its repeatedly stated aim the eradication of the world’s only Jewish state. Among those stories lost during last week’s fighting is the IAEA’s discovery of a massive increase in centrifuge building at Iran’s nuclear facilities.
Like the Mullahs, the Brotherhood and other Islamists have very clear aims, and a very clear drive. Their brands of revolutionary politics are noticeable for two things in particular: fundamentalism and patience. While many groups — al-Qa’eda for instance — possess one of these traits, until now, few possessed both.
The overthrow of the dictators is recognised as one of the great stories of our time. And so it is. But the rise to power and consolidation of the Islamists is that story’s overlooked sequel. Today the complexities of the region look in danger of clarifying. Obviously this development matters very much to Israel. But anyone who thinks these forces are only a problem for Israel should reflect on the fact that — by their own unanimous admission — the Islamists only intend to be a problem for Israel first. (Douglas Murray, The Spectator.)
No amount of surrender from Israel or any other Western nation will satisfy the Jihadists now occupying the seats of power from Cairo to Tehran. They believe in a 'second coming', the Mahdi, a saviour and instigator of an 'Armageddon'. But the Islamists are not content to allow God to make it happen, they want to usher it in all on their own, thus they have no aversion to annihilating millions if need be. Note the end of the article where it says...Israel first.

Too true!

Is it humanly possible not to be impressed by the sheer erudition of the following passage:
Comparisons are odious, generalisations dangerous and stereotypes invidious, but without them conversation would be tedious and talk nothing but an endless regression of subordinate clauses, each qualifying what the previous one had asserted. It is cowardly and dishonest to refuse these means of arriving at truth, nor would we approach any nearer to truth were we to do so. Refusing to generalise is often a form of denial.
 
The author of this superb (and very true) piece of writing is Theodore Dalrymple a nom de plume of course, and as delicious as is his name, his writing is even better. A retired surgeon and psychiatrist; his insight into the human condition is acute, funny and disturbing. Perhaps he could even be considered prophetic in some of his observations. A writer well worth taking the trouble to read.

Personal archive

After a moment of introspection I believe that I am using this blog as a way of preserving titbits of information for my archives as much as it is a venue for me to express my dissatisfaction with events happening out there in realworldland. That said the following is a must include in documenting the last few years:
Read it and weep.

Adjournment Debate: Five Years of Labor Failures
Josh Frydenberg MP
26 November 2011

It was John Kenneth Galbraith who once said ‘Nothing is so admirable in politics as a short memory.’

This may be all well and good for the politician who has committed the original sin but for the public who bear the brunt of that politician’s bad policy there is little forgiveness. And there is no worse government that what we have seen over the last five years, or 1,827 days, of the Rudd-Gillard government.
Let us recount just some of Labor’s greatest failures over the last five years. I am sure there are many to add but here it goes.
We have the carbon tax from a Prime Minister who said there would be no carbon tax under the government she led and a PM who promised a citizens assembly to generate a consensus and said she was from a party of ‘truth telling’.
The mining tax which was first announced with no industry consultation and then introduced with so much industry consultation it produced zero revenue.
The company tax cut which was never delivered and saw Labor members like the Minister for Small Business and the member for Deakin tell their constituents the day before the announcement saying the company tax would be delivered.
The Henry tax review report which sat in the Treasurer’s cupboard for six months before he released it, only to announce he was only going to accept one out of 138 recommendations—no surprise from a government that conducts itself by review, setting up more than 200 inquiries and reviews, the daddy of them all being the 2020 Summit.
Then there are the 2012-13 surplus that was a rolled-gold guarantee, then a commitment, then an objective, then a guiding principle, now an expectation that will never be delivered.
The four biggest budget deficits in Australia’s history.
A net debt of $147 billion with an interest bill of $20 million a day and a debt ceiling of $300 billion from a starting position of having $70 billion in the bank and a debt ceiling of only $75 billion.
An NBN which started at just over a $4 billion commitment, that had no cost-benefit analysis, the proposal for which was prepared by the Minister for Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy on the back of an envelope, has now blown out to $50 billion and has more than 1,300 staff and only 7,000 customers.
A bungled Australia Network tender which led to a police investigation and the government being forced to make compensation payments.
There has been government waste on a grand scale, from the pink batts that led to hundreds of house fires to the overpriced school halls, the set top boxes that were cheaper at Gerry Harvey’s and the $70 million being spent on government advertising to sell a carbon tax no one wants.
The embarrassing, costly and public failures of the green loans, GroceryWatch, Fuel watch and clash for clunkers.

There is the introduction of more than 20,000 new or amended regulations with only 104 repealed, strangling small business in a sea of red tape and burdensome regulation.
The failure to protect our borders with more than 30,000 unauthorised arrivals and 500 boats with hundreds of lives tragically lost at sea, riots in our detention centres and a budget blowout of more than $6 billion, not to mention the farce of the East Timor solution the Timorese government did not want and the Malaysia solution the High Court would not allow.
The dramatic and dangerous cuts to defence spending which has fallen to the lowest level since 1938.
And the misdirection of our aid spending that has seen Australian taxpayers funding a statue in New York that commemorates the end of slavery in the Caribbean.
We also have the farce of the live cattle export issue which cost millions of dollars and thousands of jobs.
The dumbing down of our foreign policy by our Prime Minister, who would rather be sitting with a class of schoolkids than representing the country meeting fellow world leaders abroad; an Asia Pacific Community that never got off the ground but only damaged our relationships in the region; the leaking of a private telephone conversation with President Bush over the G20; calling the Chinese ‘rat somethings’; and the bypassing of a trusted partner in Japan on Mr Rudd’s first visit overseas. The current Foreign Minister Senator Carr has also launched into Papua New Guinea, calling for sanctions against them. If that is what a rehearsed kabuki actor behaves like, then save us all.
The list goes on: the backflip and embarrassment over the supertrawler; the copying by the Leader of the House of lines from The American President in a speech to the Press Club; a Treasurer who pretends he is Bruce Springsteen and then goes on to call Republicans in the United States ‘cranks and crazies’ to support his political base; a Prime Minister who belittles our parliament with a trumped up and false charge of misogyny only to then back the then Speaker Peter Slipper after the substance of some repugnant text messages became public, not to mention the Attorney-General giving Mr Slipper privileged access to the judges car park; and there was the Australia Day riot that had its origins in a confected anti-Abbott manoeuvre.
The list goes on and on.
The faceless men in the Labor Party removed Kevin Rudd as Prime Minister—now the Australian people want to have their say so let them have their say in an election tomorrow

Saturday 24 November 2012

The Harpies cry!

The tragic truth in this world of pro-death journalism is that facts matter little in the face of overt and manipulative emotionalism: http://www.mercatornet.com/articles/view/irelands_abortion_furore

Wednesday 21 November 2012

Wheeeeeeeeee!

Welcome to the cabaret my friends, the magical mystery tour.

Athens on the Potomac

by Peter Smith
November 13, 2012

After Obama’s election win, the head of the major union umbrella body, Richard Trumka, AFL-CIO President, called for increased taxes on the rich, no cuts to entitlement programs, and a relaxed attitude to the budget deficit. In other words, welcome to Greece writ large.

Obviously, along with numbers of union bosses, he sees himself as a future commissar once the capitalist system has been destroyed. There can be no better illustration as to why the GOP should hold fast to its conservative economic principles, despite all the post-election blues and soul searching.
After all, what are these principles that so offend the sensibilities of the left. They are small government and individual self-reliance. They are designed to produce a more self-fulfilled, prosperous society, better able to help those in real need. These are principles worth prosecuting and defending.
The economic principles of the Democratic Party, and of the left more generally, are wrapped around big government dispensing largesse to increasing numbers of the population. This is regarded as a caring and empathetic response to disadvantage. But there is no end game. The whole rationale depends on government getting bigger and bigger. The effect is to undermine self-reliance and promote dependency. That is caring and empathetic only in the mind of would-be despots.
Moreover, dispensing largesse doesn’t pay the bills. To what extent do leading Democrats, and all those on the left, factor paying the bills into their worldview? I simply don’t know. I have never been able to pin them down

Friday 16 November 2012

Musing on art

A thought: Perhaps we make art with too much emphasis on 'making art' rather than employing art as a means to express an idea, an emotion, a love, a hate, a passion or a fear, much like a musician uses a guitar or a poet uses words to express his desires.

I certainly have been guilty of this, perhaps I have always made 'art' rather than used it to express my own or even others emotions. Perhaps I need to follow Alice into the rabbits tunnel.

But to use art merely to express something is also not enough. If art is a method of communicating  ideas and emotions then it needs to take into account the understanding of those who receive it. And what if the communities concept of what 'art' is has not been achieved by the artists because that group has neglected the role of art as an expressor, or indeed even felt the need to communicate with the wider audience?
Does that mean that the wider communities 'artistic literacy' will have deteriorated?
Perhaps something that was never established cannot deteriorate!
Is there is a form out there that fulfils all the necessary criteria.

Wednesday 14 November 2012

Thoughts from a tiny mind.

Unfortunately the Church today just does not equip the average believer to walk in the real world.
Lutzer reminds us that the Western church has largely fallen into the same trap that the German church had: a bifurcated church. Hitler told the church to just stick to their business, and leave the rest to him. We are hearing the exact same things today with many believers thinking their faith has no connection at all with the political, social and cultural world around them.
And various types of hate crimes laws, and vilification and discrimination legislation are reinforcing this. Increasingly the church is being told it cannot enter the public arena with its beliefs, but must simply remain silent in the public square. And many believers are foolishly going along with this. (Meuhlenberg 12.11.12)
 
The re-election of Obama is a classic illustration of this. Nowhere else in American history has a man more opposed to everything that made America great, i.e. its Judeo-Christian heritage, been able to pull the wool over evangelical Christians eyes. Yes he sometimes calls himself a Christian, so did Hitler at the very beginning of his tenure as 'Fuhrer'. Yet this mans history (Obama) and those who have discipled him his whole life are there for any person to research. How can an estimated 8 million 'evangelicals' still vote for such a man. It boggles my tiny little mind.

Tuesday 13 November 2012

Dangerous!

I believe that this is an essential documentary to watch...go on, I dare you!
vimeo.com/52009124 You only have 25 days of free viewing available after that you have to buy it @  agendadocumentary.com/

Sobering

A sobering and insightful observance of where the church is at in today's society.
http://www.billmuehlenberg.com/2012/11/09/weeping-in-babylon/
I am moved to self-examination and not impressed by what I discover. God help me in my weaknesses, what a wretch I am...thank God for the sacrifice and resurrection of Jesus!

Monday 12 November 2012

New friendships!

I have discovered a new (for me) philosopher, Pascal Bruckner, and he is interesting:
"One could cite such quotations forever, given the spread of apocalyptic literature. Authors, journalists, politicians and scientists compete in their portrayal of abomination and claim for themselves a hyperlucidity: They alone see the future clearly while others vegetate in the darkness.
The fear that these intellectuals spread is like a gluttonous enzyme that swallows up an anxiety, feeds on it, and then leaves it behind for new ones. When the Fukushima nuclear plant melted down after the enormous earthquake in Japan in March 2011, it only confirmed an existing anxiety that was looking for some content. In six months, some new concern will grip us: a pandemic, bird flu, the food supply, melting ice caps, cell-phone radiation.
The fear becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy, with the press reporting, as though it were a surprise, that young people are haunted by the very concerns about global warming that the media continually broadcast. As in an echo chamber, opinion polls reflect the views promulgated by the media.
We are inoculated against anxiety by the repetition of the same themes, which become a narcotic we can't do without.
 
and..............
 In classical Judaism, the prophet sought to give new life to God's cause against kings and the powerful. In Christianity, millenarian movements embodied a hope for justice against a church wallowing in luxury and vice. But in a secular society, a prophet has no function other than indignation. So it happens that he becomes intoxicated with his own words and claims a legitimacy with no basis, calling down the destruction that he pretends to warn against.
You'll get what you've got coming! That is the death wish that our misanthropes address to us. These are not great souls who alert us to troubles but tiny minds who wish us suffering if we have the presumption to refuse to listen to them. Catastrophe is not their fear but their joy. It is a short distance from lucidity to bitterness, from prediction to anathema.
Another result of the doomsayers' certainty is that their preaching, by inoculating us against the poison of terror, brings about petrification. The trembling that they want to inculcate falls flat. Anxiety has the last word. We were supposed to be alerted; instead, we are disarmed. This may even be the goal of the noisy panic: to dazzle us in order to make us docile. Instead of encouraging resistance, it propagates discouragement and despair. The ideology of catastrophe becomes an instrument of political and philosophical resignation.

Mr. Bruckner is a French writer and philosopher whose latest book is "The Paradox of Love" (Princeton University Press, 2012). This article, translated by Alexis Cornel, is excerpted from the Spring 2012 issue of City Journal

Tuesday 6 November 2012

Vote responsibly.

I realize that my voice in these elections is tiny, but I will do what I can if it means that the inevitable collapse of America is delayed. If for no other reason than the collapse of the worlds' most prominent democracy will lead to the more rapid disintegration of western societies around the globe, and though I hold no fear of my future I do wish at least some future for my children.

I hold  therefore to what bill Meuhlenberg has to say in this excerpt:
“I would hope that all who love the Scriptures would agree that we should not vote for President Obama. There are compelling reasons why a Christian should be distressed with the current administration. The President’s unqualified support of abortion goes beyond anything we saw from previous Democratic leaders like President Clinton. His public endorsement of same-sex marriage is well known. His fiscal policy has launched the federal government into reckless spending which runs up our deficit at a rate of more than a trillion dollars per year—that is, more than $3250 of additional debt per year for every one of our 312 million people. At present, our government is in debt more than $51,000 for every person living in our nation. People have documented his socialist agenda for the government to use its coercive power to steal wealth from some in order to redistribute it to others as its officials see fit.”
He then deals with the usual objections to voting in the only man who can stop Obama. What about Mormonism? “It is outside the bounds of the gospel of Jesus Christ. It adds other writings and so-called prophecies to Scripture as the Word of God. However, we are not electing a pastor. We are electing the President of the United States. We do not live in a political system where the head of state leads the established religion of the nation. We live in a system of religious liberty where our Constitution says no religious test must be passed by a candidate for public office.
“Christians can in good conscience support the political office of non-Christians. If godly Daniel was able to serve in the administration of the pagan king Nebuchadnezzar, then godly believers can support a President who is not a believer in the God of the Bible. The President’s job is not to teach sound doctrine, but to punish wrongdoers and to protect good citizens (Rom. 13:3–4), as the head of the executive branch of the government. To vote for Mitt Romney is not to endorse his views of religion, but to support him politically.
“I might also point out here that as far as I can see in Mr. Romney’s past political record, at no point has he promoted his Mormon views upon the people he has served. I cannot find a single instance where he has tried to impose unsound Mormon theology on those whom he has governed.”
After looking at other objections, he concludes, “Your vote is precious. Please do not throw it away when you could use it to defend our children against a future of abortion, sexual perversion, socialism, crushing debt, and tyranny.

Sunday 4 November 2012

Addiction anonymous

Well put Steven Kates:
In miniature, this captures the problem of the right in dealing with the left. The right has a vision of how a world can be best constructed by leaving each of us the freedom and opportunity to find our own way. It is always an adventure and nothing can be guaranteed, but there are satisfactions in being allowed to build our own lives ourselves and in our own way. But it comes with fewer forms of open-ended government support.
BY contrast, the left is filled with plans for what it will do for us: for “the poor”, “the disadvantaged”, for women, migrants, Aboriginals, or whoever can be transformed into a victim group and induced to become dependent on government programs, grants and handouts. Socialism is a drug of dependence. It is a narcotic addiction very hard to break.
The US election will be a test of the America's will to break free of this addiction. We will have our own opportunity to do the same sometime in the following twelve months.
 
I pray for the power to help break this addiction off Australia.

Friday 2 November 2012

Sesquipedalianism!

This is a passage taken from a description of an artists inspiration for a new body of work:
This project, while it is more physically engaged, follows on from MacKenny’s on-going interest in examining the intersection of different visual conventions (illusionism and flatness occupying the same frame), and the conflation of potentially oppositional vocabularies which provide a locus for exploring perception within a worldview that is personal yet contextually aware. Her works investigate ‘solastalgia’ – a term coined by philosopher Glenn Albrecht to describe the effects of global warming on the mental states of Australians. The combination of solacium (comfort) and algia (pain) infers an emotional disquiet that results from nostalgia firmly rooted in the now. The pain of nostalgia comes from taking comfort in the things that have given one pleasure in the past, but realising that those things are no longer. Solastalgia, however, indicates a present that is becoming a past before one’s very eyes; the environment, which we imbue with so much meaning, is disappearing as we watch it.
 
The artist is an old friend and a once mentor and teacher of mine. I have always been inspired by her abilities as a painter and it pains me to witness such a talent in the service of such a farce. The pretensions in this verse reflect the disease that has gripped many segments of Western society not only the arts. The essay in its entirety is an explanation of what the exhibition is about as well as what has motivated the artist to make the works in it.

Art today must have a rationale, it is no longer acceptable just to make art because you feel like creating something. Today we must be motivated by something bigger, more 'universal' (the Quixotic quest) something of a 'religious' nature. In the pursuit of a questionable freedom, Western intellectuals have turned from a reasonable faith; Christianity (which they insist is irrational) to an 'upper-storey' (unreasoned and truly irrational) faith; namely Gaia.

Tom Wolfe writes about the literary arts thus:
"It is at this point that poetry, if it is to be considered serious, becomes difficult. The serious poet begins to make his work hard to understand in order to show that he is elevating himself above the rabble, which is now known of course, as the bourgeoisie. He is writing for what the French critic Catulle Mendes referred to as 'a charming aristocracy," "an elite in this age of democracy." There was something vulgar and common about harping on 'meaning.'"
In the visual arts you find millions upon millions (ad nauseaum) of words trundled out in support of the new(old)age neo-paganistic cult of Gaia (It was classified a cult in the 1st Century!). And the words visual artists embrace to explain their art and motivations are like those the Wolfe poet above uses; esoteric in nature and arranged in ways intended to confuse the non-initiate (bourgeoisie). The fact that such language tends to confuse the wannabe initiate (often even the initiates are baffled) is besides the point, the myth of the Emperors clothes is alive and thriving in the 'world of art'. The pretensions behind such buffoonery are almost amusing if they were not so tragic in their consequences.

Lord: May those who truly seek find true truth.

Thursday 1 November 2012

Cooling it!

This technique as discussed by Thomas Sowell sounds hauntingly familiar to Australian followers of political news:
Confidence men know that their victim — "the mark" as he has been called — is eventually going to realize that he has been cheated. But it makes a big difference whether he realizes it immediately, and goes to the police, or realizes it after the confidence man is long gone.
So part of the confidence racket is creating a period of uncertainty, during which the victim is not yet sure of what is happening. This delaying process has been called "cooling out the mark."
The same principle applies in politics. When the accusations that led to the impeachment of President Bill Clinton first surfaced, he flatly denied them all. Then, as the months passed, the truth came out — but slowly, bit by bit. One of Clinton's own White House aides later called it "telling the truth slowly."
By the time the whole truth came out, it was called "old news," and the clever phrase now was that we should "move on."
It was a successful "cooling out" of the public, keeping them in uncertainty so long that, by the time the whole truth came out, there was no longer the same outrage as if the truth had suddenly come out all at once. Without the support of an outraged public, the impeachment of President Clinton fizzled out in the Senate.

Manipulation

I have always tried to instill a healthy skepticism into my children, myself and my friends regarding the claims of Hollywood that the latest movie blockbuster is based on 'history'. I have not always been successful because the power of celluloid is mighty.

Consider what Francis Schaeffer said more than 40 years ago:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A place for Hollow people.

For any who might be enthralled by that hollow.org that is the United Nations...read this and weep!
http://freedomwatch.ipa.org.au/free-speech-is-a-gift-from-the-united-nations/