What to think?

The real tragedy of this unfortunate communique which was sent to my email address is that as far as my reading of the three books of Islam and assorted research goes; it appears to be true.
If one calls himself a good Muslim then these strictures do apply and it is all rather disconcerting.
I resist the PC tolerance brigade's attempts to manipulate my thinking into such criticism being somehow 'racist' (an inaccuracy of definition to begin with) and I hold to the idea of loving all people with an agape love irrespective of race, creed or disposition, but the fact is that we are called to be as wise as serpents whilst striving to be a gentle as doves.

..........................................................................................................................................

CAN MUSLIMS BE GOOD AMERICANS????? [or Australians?]

Maybe this is why our American Muslims are so quiet and not speaking out about any atrocities.

Can a good Muslim be a good American?

This question was forwarded to a friend who worked in Saudi Arabia for 20 years. The following is his reply:

Theologically - no. Because his allegiance is to Allah, The moon god of Arabia .

Religiously - no. Because no other religion is accepted by His Allah except Islam. (Quran,2:256)(Koran)

Scripturally - no. Because his allegiance is to the five Pillars of Islam and the Quran.

Geographically - no. Because his allegiance is to Mecca , to which he turns in prayer five times a day.

Socially - no. Because his allegiance to Islam forbids him to make friends with Christians or Jews.

Politically - no. Because he must submit to the mullahs (spiritual leaders), who teach annihilation of Israel and destruction of America , the great Satan.

Domestically - no. Because he is instructed to marry four Women and beat and scourge his wife when she disobeys him. (Quran 4:34)

Intellectually - no. Because he cannot accept the American Constitution since it is based on Biblical principles and he believes the Bible to be corrupt.

Philosophically - no. Because Islam, Muhammad, and the Quran does not allow freedom of religion and expression. Democracy and Islam cannot co-exist. Every Muslim

government is either dictatorial or autocratic.

Spiritually - no. Because when we declare 'one nation under God,' The Christian's God is loving and kind, while Allah is NEVER referred to as Heavenly father, nor is he ever called love in the Quran's 99 excellent names.

Therefore, perhaps we should be very suspicious of ALL MUSLIMS in this country. They obviously cannot be both 'good' Muslims and 'good' Americans. Call it what you wish it's still the truth. You had better believe it. The more who understand this, the better it will be for our country and our future.

Footnote: The Muslims have said they will destroy us from within. SO FREEDOM IS NOT FREE.

Turn or burn

When activists and their tame scientists use 'scientific statistics' to scare people into doing what they (the activists) want, it is nothing less than political manipulation. http://jennifermarohasy.com/2013/05/the-great-barrier-reef-have-we-really-lost-half-of-it-part-1-water-quality/
These 'snake-oil sale persons' establish themselves on top of the moral pyramid (by implication) and then speak down to the rest of us that if we do not listen to their dictates then we are all going to die.
Turn or burn; sounds quite fundamentalist doesn't it?
The truly distressing result of all of this manipulation, lying, cheating and narcissism is that the 'ordinary' (see powerless) person begins to trust no-one.
Scientists have been proven mendacious time and time again lying and manipulating to further their careers or too prove some activist theory and thus science itself ceases to be an argument. Philosophers argue that there is no truth and everything is up for interpretation. Politicians are worse than lawyers even though in the labor party most are both, and no-one believes anything any politician says.
What does all of this lead to?
Chaos, destabilisation, anarchy.
When a morally relativistic judiciary hand out slaps on wrists to the most callous of criminals it means that soon the afore mentioned 'ordinary' people will start taking the law into their own hands as they did in South Africa as a result of the politicisation of the police force.
That led to terrible things...if you are old and knowledgeable enough you might remember the 'necklace' a demonic system of 'justice' if ever there was one.
The question that looms large is; are the coalition any better than the current lot or have all sold out to expediency and the will to power?
Only time will tell, but one thing is for sure, they can't be any worse...if Australia is to survive.

Nuts in a shell.

Here is the left-wing ideology summed up in a nutshell:

As someone of the Left, you apparently assume this monoculture is so normal as to be beyond ideology. You apparently comfort yourself with the fond belief that the rest of us don’t notice how your ideological leanings and assumptions – whether on global warming or the benign nature of government controls on free speech - actually do inform your work. Indeed, you may even assume as Marr famously did - that to be “soft Left” is the “natural” position for a journalist, and thus conclude that to allow a conservative in the door is to betray journalism itself. This might lead you to pooh-pooh critics as just ideologues themselves. Unlike you, of course.
 

Well put sir!

A newly despised minority.

I have published parts of this before and spoken on it many times but I believe it to be so important that I shall post it once more. Christians be aware of what is happening.

Michael Snyder American Dream  April 8, 2013

Are evangelical Christians rapidly becoming one of the most hated minorities in America? Once upon a time such a notion would have been unthinkable, but these days things are changing dramatically. All over the United States, evangelical Christians are being called “extremists” and evangelical Christian organizations are being labeled as “hate groups”. In fact, as I will detail later on in this article, a U.S. Army Reserve training presentation recently specifically identified evangelical Christians as “religious extremists”. This should be extremely chilling for all evangelical Christians out there, because as history has shown us over and over again, when you want to persecute a particular group of people the first step is always to demonize them. And that is exactly what is being done to evangelical Christians today. Just look at how evangelical Christians are being portrayed on television and in the movies. Just look at how much hate is being spewed at Christians on the Internet. The Southern Poverty Law Center and the ACLU, both of which are considered to be among the most prominent “civil rights” organizations in the United States, are seemingly obsessed with attacking evangelical Christians. It has become trendy to bash Christians, and that is a very frightening thing. After they have finished demonizing evangelical Christians, what will the next step be?

A U.S. Army Reserve equal opportunity training presentation entitled “Extremism and Extremist Organizations” actually included “Evangelical Christianity” as an example of “Religious Extremism” in a list that also included al-Qaeda, Hamas and the Ku Klux Klan. You can find a copy of the entire presentation right here.

Is this how evangelical Christians will be treated in the future? Will evangelical Christians be treated like members of the Ku Klux Klan or like members of al-Qaeda?

The following is how a Christian Post article described this chilling report…

A U.S. Army Reserve Equal Opportunity training brief describes “Evangelical Christianity” and “Catholicism” as examples of “religious extremism,” according to the Archdiocese for the Military Services and the Chaplain Alliance for Religious Liberty, who shared a copy of the documents with The Christian Post.

“The number of hate groups, extremists and anti‐govt organizations in the U.S. has continued to grow over the past three years, according to reports by the Southern Poverty Law Center. They increased to 1,018 in 2011, up from 1,002 in 2010 and 602 in 2000,” reads the first page of the slide presentation labeled “Extremism & Extremist Organizations.”

Listed alongside “extremist” groups and organizations like the Klu Klux Klan and al-Qaida, the U.S. Army slideshow has “Evangelical Christianity” as the first bullet, followed by the Muslim Brotherhood, Ultra-Orthodox Judaism and farther down on the slide, Catholicism.

To lie or not to lie...

Left-wing academics (oxymoron??) live in such ivory towers that they do not necessarily ignore evidence contrary to their own opinions, THEY ARE PROBABLY NOT EVEN AWARE THAT SUCH DIFFERENCES COULD POSSIBLY EXIST.

For example the latest storm in a teacup that necessitates their attention is that the Australian government(s), the RSL and other nefarious ANZAC 'spirits' have 'militarised' the entire Australian population.

These desk-bound pacifists champ at the bit about how our youth are being 'led down the military garden path' and vociferously decry the 'spectacle' of the Anzac parades.

How brave of them to speak truth to power. Note these same academics supporting Islamic sexism, violence, Anti-Jewish boycotts, the banning of free speech on college campuses etc etc.

However the saddest thing about their latest whingeing about the Anzac's is not so much their rampant hypocrisy as it is that these so-called 'scholars' fail the basic standard of factual objectivity required for an academic pursuit of truth.

If you had to sum up the authors' attitudes to wars, one observation is relevant: they concentrate on those wars that suit their pacifist and peace-march assumptions. Thus the ultimate opposition by a host of Australians to the Vietnam War is discussed, often vividly, but World War II is neatly skipped over and the Korean War is ignored. A section on Australia in the years 1939-42 should have been absolutely essential in the planning of this book. Instead the authors dwell on Australia's attitudes to Japan in the years 1904-14.

The authors even scorn the fears -- sometimes expressed in parliament and the press -- that a combined Japanese force might endanger Australian shores. But they are silent on the fact those forecasts came close to the bone in 1942. You could read this book and not learn that Japan invaded New Guinea and bombed Darwin. Japan's record in World War II is not really mentioned. Do the authors support Australia's participation in World War II? This book leaves readers in some doubt.

So it is unusual to see the RSL being singled out as an enemy of national values, while wartime Japan and Nazi Germany are essentially exempt from criticism.

Read the full exposure of their claims: http://www.theaustralian.com.au/arts/books/we-werent-that-dumb/story-e6frg8nf-1225848127735

Tasmaniacs & Vicmaniacs

Welcome to basket-case Tasmania's new wild world of legislature. Legalise prostitution, legalise drugs, homosexual marriage, legalise any new  moral travesty you can  imagine but criminalise free choice to oppose these perversions.
Who woulda thunk it?

Legislation enabling abortion is common enough. But the Tasmanian law could be the first in the world to penalise doctors, counsellors and protesters with draconian fines and even jail sentences if they oppose abortion. Health minister Michelle O’Byrne says that the bill has been modelled on 2008 legislation in the nearby state of Victoria. But she also seems to have been inspired by the peculiar interpretation of democracy invoked by Vladimir Putin when the Russian government jailed the punk rock group Pussy Riot.

Here is what the bill proposes.

A doctor with a conscientious objection to abortion must refer a woman to another doctor. No penalty is specified, but non-compliance might lead to deregistration. A counsellor who refuses to refer a woman to an abortion clinic could be fined A$32,500. A protester who exhibits a placard or utters negative words about abortion within 150 metres of a clinic could be fined $65,000 and jailed for one year. (The two busiest churches in Hobart are located within 150 metres.)
 

UPDATE
I wrote yesterday (above) about the new law about to effect Tasmania, not realising that a similar one has existed in Victoria for some time, note this story:

A Melbourne doctor has defended his decision to refuse to refer a couple for an abortion because they did not want a girl. Dr Mark Hobart acknowledged that under Victorian law if a doctor has a moral objection to a woman's choice to abort a pregnancy, that doctor must refer the woman to a doctor who does not object.

He also admitted that he may face suspension or possibly be deregistered for refusing to give the couple a referral when he discovered their reasons for abortion.

"But just because it's the law, doesn't mean it's right," Dr Hobart was quoted by the Herald Sun as saying.

The unnamed coupled reportedly asked Dr Hobart to refer them to an abortion clinic after discovering at 19 weeks they were having a girl when they wanted a boy.

A Medical Practitioners Board spokeswoman said doctors were bound by Victoria's Abortion Law Reform Act 2008 as well as a professional code of conduct.

"The board expects practitioners to practise lawfully and to provide safe care and to meet the standards set out in the board's code of conduct," she said.

In January the Medical Board cautioned a doctor for airing his views against abortion and warned he could be deregistered if it happened again.

The god of this world

We do not often hear the full title of Darwin's paean to evolutionary theory:  On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life.

Nor do we hear how his ideas, with a little help from Frederick Nietzsche, and Margaret Sanger reached their fruition in Nazi Germany.

The fact that Barak Obama now calls on 'God' to bless Planned Parenthood (Margaret Sanger's paean to murder, and to the eradication of black folk) makes one wonder how intelligent this man really is and calls into question which god he serves, although given his track record I would think that this is fairly obvious.