VOTING QUESTIONS/ONSIDERATIONS

Some more considerations to think about when voting:

Del-Cons can safely vote in pursuit of their objective. Doing so does not automatically mean “putting the Liberal last”; that only applies to those with the Mark of Cain upon them, who voted to oust Abbott last September (see https://truebluenz.com/ ). There were originally 56 Liberal (including Liberal National Party) members in that category, but nine have since left the Parliament; in those latter cases one needs to examine their pre-selected replacements closely. In Mackellar, for example, the new Liberal candidate, Jason Falinski, is even further Left than Turnbull; so put him last.
To recap, then, those “Rules of Engagement”, first for the House: (1) vote National wherever a National Party candidate is standing; (2) if your Liberal Party member was among those betraying their leader last September, put that person last – and last means last; but if not, then vote for him or her as usual. In the Senate, the same principles apply but, because of the different voting system, must be activated somewhat differently: (3) most importantly, vote below the line, filling in 12 squares but excluding anyone in the Coalition lists who betrayed Abbott. To illustrate, in NSW I propose to give my first four votes to the four Nationals listed on the joint ticket; then to three Liberals, but excluding Marise Payne, Arthur Sinodinos and (for other reasons) Hollie Hughes; and then to Family First, Christian Democrats, Australian Liberty Alliance, Liberal Democrats and the Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party. Easy; just follow the Rules

THE LEFT HATES REFERENDUMS

http://townhall.com/columnists/dennisprager/2016/06/28/why-the-left-hates-referendums-n2184036?utm_source=thdailypm&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl_pm&newsletterad=

A REARGUARD ACTION

I mentioned on Friday that the Brexit vote was going to challenged and challenged and challenged, because the anarchists of the left and their parasitical fellow travellers do not want freedom from the trough that is keeping them in both wealth and power.

One does not have to look far to see how the truth of this observation is playing out.....
http://quadrant.org.au/opinion/qed/2016/06/brexit-battle-far-won/

SHARP PALETTE

Who can turn a phrase as eloquently as Theodore D I ask with tears in my eyes? And in doing so simultaneously capturing and puncturing the pretensions of our new (mostly young) 'elites'.

The food is very good in Sydney in a way in which I am sure it would not have been in, say, 1950. I am also almost certain that when people speak of the glories of multiculturalism they are mostly thinking of a lot of different restaurants, rather than Pali epigraphy or Somali tribal structure. As in all major cities nowadays, waiters prance around in Sydney telling the diners that the kale or quinoa was picked by vestal virgins on the first full moon after the equinox. I like good food as much as the next man, and am all in favour of not taking the pleasures of life for granted; but this new food paganism, the reverence for ingredients and the way in which they are produced (or ‘sourced’… always responsibly of course), irritates me slightly. It seems to imply that one is supposed to do more with the food on one’s plate than merely to eat it. When the explanations are too elaborate, one begins to feel unworthy of what one is about to eat, because one is not absolutely sure that one can tell the difference between sea salt, say, and rock salt.

VICTORY!

BREXIT has triumphed and the elites are freaking out!

But 'they' are not going to let the little people overturn their 'kingdom' I promise you, watch this space. Already the pound has slumped, no doubt encouraged by those who want to punish such a brash decision by the ignorant against their political 'betters.'

The left media is not going to take this lying down, Brace yourselves for a flood of negativity and a legal stoush the like of which we have not yet witnessed.

Every legal (and illegal) precedent is going to be thrown at those from the Exit camp in the hope of a change of ruling from the supreme courts which, if successful, will illustrate just how much control has passed to the faceless bureaucracies.

Congratulations to the ordinary folk of Britain.

My prayer now is that the unelected 'masters of the universe' do not unleash economic tyranny on Britain so as to render this a Phyrric victory.

YUCK ART

Ah....the wisdom of Theodore:

hthttp://www.newenglishreview.org/blog_direct_link.cfm/blog_id/64477/cat_id/13/Ah-The-Sophisticated-Open-Mindedness-of-Modern-

CRICK CRACKS

Francis Crick the discoverer of DNA was a committed atheist who spent his life denying a God exists...then embraces one without even realising it...or maybe he did?:

"We do not know... uncertain... not too far out... we do not know for certain... we suspect... chances are..." And thus the Nobel prize winner embraces the theory that space aliens sent rocketships to seed the earth. The man of science who confidently dismissed God at Mill Hill School half a century earlier appears not to have noticed that he'd merely substituted for his culturally inherited monotheism a weary variant on Greco-Roman-Norse pantheism – the gods in the skies who fertilize the earth and then retreat to the heavens beyond our reach. To be sure, he leaves them as anonymous aliens showering seed rather than Zeus adopting the form of a swan, but nevertheless Dr Crick's hyper-rationalism took 50 years to lead him round to embracing a belief in a celestial creator of human life, indeed a deus ex machina.