JOURNA(LIE)SM

Without stating the bleeding obvious, the relativisation of truth has resulted in journalists printing outright lies without fear of retribution from their employers or readers because; "Hey! Whats true for you is not true for me" etc, ad nauseum. We are for example, bombarded with cherry picked 'facts' painting a false picture of Anthropogenic global warming, 'facts which most ordinary people who actually lived through the 'hottest year on record' KNOW to be false, to this pathetic attempt to relativise Muslim atrocities:

http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/no_dee_right_wing_extremists_arent_deadlier_than_muslim_terrorists/

CHE CHIC

And yet this serial murdering psychopath is being honoured by an American President:

Who said the following – Che Guevara or Adolf Hitler?
“Youth must refrain from ungrateful questioning of governmental mandates. Instead, they must dedicate themselves to study, work and military service.”
“The victory of Socialism is well worth millions of atomic victims!”
“Hatred is the central element of our struggle! Hatred so violent that it propels a human being beyond his natural limitations, making him a violent and cold- blooded killing machine.”
“We must do away with all newspapers. A revolution cannot be accomplished with freedom of the press.”
“Youth should learn to think and act as a mass. It is criminal to think as individuals!”
“I’d like to confess, Papa, at that moment I discovered that I really like killing.”
If you answered Che, Che, Che, Che, Che and Che – give yourself an A.

Our world has truly gone mad. We have sacrificed our intelligence on the altar of  political correctness which is in truth homage at the shrine of Marxism.

CLEVER GRAPHICS

This is what I consider a very powerful illustration of sympathy for the Brussels catastrophe:

DROP-KICK PAGAN GREENIES!

Tasmanian society should be made to wear their decisions. Let the electorate live under the consequences of  the obstructionist, Marxist inspired, collectivist vision of the Greens and watch how rapidly the 'people' will drop the tree-hugging, pagan occultists at the next election.

Yesterday’s Inquirer piece (“Fighting to keep Tasmania’s lights on in energy crisis“, The Australian) overlooked the fact that the current Tasmanian energy crisis is the inevitable outcome of 30 years of green policies.
It is also the height of hypocrisy for people who have opposed investment in new coal, gas, hydro or nuclear power to now criticise electricity shortages.
For too long now, policymakers throughout the western world have used electricity networks to pursue political and environmental goals rather than simply supply affordable, reliable and safe power. In Australia, Europe and North America, investment in fossil fuel or nuclear generation has been discouraged, with preference given to wind, solar, or more interconnectors. The result has been the destruction of market price signals, higher costs, and decreased reliability. South Australia and Tasmania are now paying the price.
Instead of lobbying for another interconnector, the Tasmanian government should back self-reliance, bite the bullet, build a new power station, and send the bill to the Greens.

The same socialistic motivations as those ruling the Greens led Venezuela into the crisis it now 'enjoys'. What is their ultimate ambition for the citizens of Free Western countries? Allow the Venezuelan Minister of Education to elucidate:

A couple of years ago, the then minister of education admitted that the aim of the regime’s policies was “not to take the people out of poverty so they become middle class and then turn into escuálidos” (a derogatory term to denote opposition members). In other words, the government wanted grateful, dependent voters, not prosperous Venezuelans.

THE SMELL OF GREASEPAINT IN THE MORNING

Act # 666 of the ongoing comic opera called the human rights committee for refugees:

Refugee activists are now refugees themselves, fleeing from their own offices:
Australia’s largest asylum seeker service is in upheaval after an exodus of its most senior staff and claims of a toxic work environment, mismanagement and bullying.
Six out of seven directors at the Asylum Seeker Resource Centre quit last year, including one who lodged a successful WorkCover claim for stress and anxiety caused by her employment.
An internal report, prepared for the board and obtained by Fairfax Media, shows the resignations came amid a slew of complaints about the centre’s chief executive, Kon Karapanagiotidis?, widely considered one of the nation’s top human rights advocates.
“We are greatly concerned about our safety and wellbeing, and that of our staff, due to the unknown response from an increasingly volatile CEO,” said the confidential report, co-signed by four of the former directors.
You might conclude that this is another example of the phenomenon of so many modern humanitarians - that they love humanity in theory, but not humans in practice. Or maybe philosopher Bertrand Russell had it right:
Much that passes as idealism is disguised hatred or disguised love of power.
But then I read this:
Mr Karapanagiotidis did not respond to questions, but he is understood to vehemently deny all allegations. In a statement, the ASRC board said its own investigation found “no basis” to the claims and it continued to stand by its chief executive.
In which case you might conclude instead that refugee activists tend to exaggerate.
 

AMEN JOANNA!

More bovine faeces thrown into the face of history by the most cosseted student 'radicals' in that history:
"Look at me, look at me", they scream in the guise of caring.
Little shits claiming holier-than-thou status in a fog of 'academic' ignorance, all the while proving Orwell's prophetic genius:

"Joanna Williams, education editor at Spiked and lecturer in higher education at the University of Kent, said: “I think is cowardly on behalf of Cambridge University to do this and I think students have declared war on the past and this is another example of how students are using history as a morality play to express their own moral superiority in the present.

“They want to demonstrate that they are more enlightened than previous generations of students. It’s easier to fight battles against the past. Instead they come across as they want to eradicate the past or use the past to express their moral superiority in the present.

THE SUBVERSIVE YEAST WITHIN UNIVERSITIES TODAY

In this brief excerpt, conservative philosopher Roger Scruton writes about the time he spent in Bucharest with the members of a small conservative think tank and how the conversation moved onto subjects featured in the curriculums of various Western University's:

Most of those present had spent time in a western university, and all had been troubled by the curriculum they had encountered there. In their eyes the western curriculum seems to have no other appeal than that which comes from deconstructing the forms of authority and order which have come down to us from our Judaeo-Christian culture. And yet that appeal is enough: nothing else seems required for academic legitimacy, and even if you write the kind of constipated sociologese of a Habermas or a Giddens, you can be guaranteed a position by those who would read you only so far as to extract the subversive and postmodern message.