ANTI-HUMAN EMPHASIS

I am particularly irked by the fiction that all who oppose the catastrophism of the 'Climate change' spruikers are in the 'pay of big oil/big coal or some other such euphemisms. 

Aside from the fact that cheap (not so cheap in our South Australian socialist 'paradise') electricity is modern society's lifeblood (think of all the iphone users...many of whom bleat about big coal/oil because they cannot compute that one comes from the other) the actual truth of the matter is that the climate change pushers are the ones making mega bucks from the whole deal.

Take Dr. Ruth Gates as an example:

Last summer, the foundation awarded her and a collaborator in Australia, Madeleine van Oppen, four million dollars to pursue the idea.

It would be a huge shame if this natural ability of corals to survive in a changing world were to stand in the way of a stream of funding that should see her well into comfortable retirement. Since corals seem to be able to adapt to conditions so far encountered, how then to ensure that things go smoothly? Why, jump onto the meme that the forthcoming rapid pace of climate change will outstrip the ability of corals to adapt, of course.

Please. please please....people,  whilst we are to be careful of those who would seek to make money irrespective of the damage it does to the environment, be aware also that those who lie and obfuscate the truth in order to profit from a seemingly unending stream of grant money are in fact doing an often greater damage to the environment, if only because the money is now being spent on political advantage rather than on eco-science and helping really damaged environments.

In fact one of the co-founders of the Greenpeace movement, Patrick Moore has said this about the new emphasis of the movement:

He quit Greenpeace in 1986 after 15 years as a co-founder, saying the organisation had become anti-science and anti-human.