CHILD SOLDIERS

I confess that there are moments when I despair at the gullibility, stupidity and naivety of fools who claim to be smart yet who jump onto bandwagons that have so many flaws as to be almost a comedy routine. Larry, Curly and Moe would have rejected the climate change scenario as; a fantasy unable to be convincing were it pitched to them.

There are reams of emails stating the writers intent to deceive (Climategate!) masses of conflicting data/evidence, many false claims (consider the recent hockey stick fandangle) and copious failed predictions https://cei.org/blog/wrong-again-50-years-failed-eco-pocalyptic-predictions?fbclid=IwAR3ptkjVMTh0NqaX6f7FKNy4piFO8zGF13uGbMG_YJsLVgwvgYPyZMeb4GQ
so much so in fact that anyone with a mere soupçon of logical intellect should at least take a pause. But NO the bandwagon(taxpayer trough) rolls on, now using children as their pawns.

Children are easily indoctrinated/manipulated/bullied/terrified into positions they have no foreknowledge of or desire to be partnered with. Consider the African warlords who kidnap and use them as child soldiers...the same instinct holds for the new 'climate soldiers' I believe.

Greta Thunberg is a confused child on the disability spectrum...it should be considered a crime to frighten her half to death and then use that fear to stoke more fear into the gullible public. The fact is that too many 'educators' (and I use that word advisedly) have indoctrinated their charges in order to send them into the streets to protest against...the life giving force behind nature????

The whole scheme delivers a double whammy because while gaining naive foot soldiers they are also preventing these same children from achieving a critical education...all in a single move, often inveigling parental complicity at the same time...It is demonically clever.

How did this extreme narcissism of believing that we humans are capable of altering the climate come about? I think it is happening because post modernist relativism and the deconstruction of language, morals and healthy skepticism has worked its poison into the minds and hearts of the populace.  

Actually, I don't believe the instigators behind this false religion believe in it at all, any more than Hubbard believed in his 'science' based religion. I think Vaclav Klaus nailed it in his speech at the Global Warming Policy Foundation in October 2010 when he said:

The current debate is a public policy debate with enormous implications. It is no longer about climate. It is about the government, the politicians, their scribes and the lobbyists who want to get more decision making and power for themselves. It seems to me that the widespread acceptance of the global warming dogma has become one of the main, most costly and most undemocratic public policy mistakes in generations. The previous one was communism.

This whole scheme is nothing more than a scam organised to redistribute wealth and the balance of power so that a neo-feudalist few can 'run the globe' ...and if you think I am hyperventilating then research Agenda 21.

QUAMVIS RESERUATIS

Ruminating on our current cultural dilemmas and the ever expanding battlefields upon which conservatives are engaging with the cultural totalitarians and thinking of course about the gauntlet recently thrown down by the 'deep state political establishment' in Britain, I reservedly agree with Melanie Phillips sentiment in this passage from her book 'The World Turned Upside Down:

Morality is privatized so that everyone becomes his or her own moral authority, while the laws and traditions rooted in Christianity and the Hebrew Bible have come under explicit attack. The old order of Western civilization, resting on the external authorities of religion and culture, has to be destroyed. With no order or purpose in the world, moral and cultural relativism are the rule; any attempt to prioritize any culture or lifestyle over any other is illegitimate.
The paradox—and it is acute—is that this relativist doctrine itself assumes the form of a dogmatic moralizing agenda that takes an absolutist position against all who challenge it and seeks to stamp out all deviations. Medieval Christianity—like contemporary Islamism—stamped out dissent by killing or conversion; Western liberals do it by social and professional ostracism and legal discrimination. It is a kind of secular Inquisition. And the grand inquisitors are to be found within the intelligentsia—in the universities, the media, the law, the political and professional classes—who not only have systematically undermined the foundations of Western society but are heavily engaged in attempting to suppress any challenge or protest.
It is paradoxical but not surprising that the assault on intellectual liberty is taking place within the institutions of reason.

Why reservedly you may ask? Because I, as both a practicing Christian and a student/teacher of history (Art, World & Christian) would argue that the ancient Christianity of the disciples, early apologists and Martyrs had been significantly hijacked by a rigidly religious hierarchy by the late medieval period; a hierarchy that was just as opposed towards true Christianity as many of the secular ideologies are today judging by the oppression and persecution of believers that eventually resulted in the Reformation and the persecution of Protestants throughout the European continent.