Friday, 31 May 2013

Bravery personified

This is one very brave girl standing up for truth. She shames the majority in Western nations who cower behind politically correct ideologies or who refuse to see Islam for what it is.
 “Sabatina James is perfectly aware just how dangerous her work is. Still, she says what needs to be said: Europe has to stand up for the values that built the Western world. What we are experiencing now is a clash between two widely different civilizations.
“Islam is not compatible with democracy and freedom of expression. That was understood in Europe, and thus you separated the church from the state. This caused Europe to continue its development while the Arabic / Muslim world is still stuck in the 7th century,” says Sabatina James.
“Because the Muslim world is ruled by holy books, it will never get anywhere, she believes. It is impossible to create a healthy society with rational individuals, when the moral idol is a 7th century warlord. An idol who even took a 9-year-old girl as his wife, and considered it his absolute, holy duty to kill ‘infidels’. ‘It might have been acceptable in the 7th century, but as it remains a demand to view Mohammed as the perfect human being – which lots of Muslims do – then it doesn’t work,’ says Sabatina James.”

Wednesday, 29 May 2013

The end is nigh

Welcome to Isiah chapter 5:
"There are quite a few organizations in this country that would prefer that our elected officials not hire bigots that hunt down and file erroneous charges against young women because of their sexual orientation. The fact is, the puritanism you practice doesn't have a place in this world any longer."
 
This is about a young female 'peadophile' caught having sexual relations with a 14 year old.
Many campaign that changing the marriage laws to accommodate the homosexual activists is not a big deal, it is merely a live-and-let-live issue, whats the harm?
It is merely the thin edge of the wedge with which these activists want to bash the heads in of those they disagree with.
Many of these activists were violently opposed to marriage not ten years ago, now they are fighting for it, why? Because it suits their campaign to have homosexuality 'normalised' in fact more than normalised because they want those who think it a deviation to be locked up, persecuted, pilloried, including those who think that peadophilia is a crime.
Note if you will in the short excerpt above, the phrase; "...the puritanism you practice doesn't have a place in this world any longer"...we are entering the period of Sodom and Gomorrah.
http://www.billmuehlenberg.com/2013/05/27/kate-sex-lies-and-the-truth/

Green greed

For those who would assert that the 'Greenies' stand atop the moral pyramid please take note of the greed and lust that actually drives them:
http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/green_carpetbaggers_load_up_in_labors_last_four_months/

Tuesday, 28 May 2013

Make peace or I'll kill you!

84% of Egyptians support the DEATH penalty for apostasy. One in eight American Muslims support the DEATH penalty for ANY American who publicly criticizes Islam.
 
A very small insight into the famous tolerance of the 'religion of peace'.
Why oh why are we tolerating these haters without complaint.
Immigrants should fit into the culture of their host countries rather than using violent means to change the culture to fit their narrow interpretation of Sharia.

Monday, 27 May 2013

art trashed

Difficult territory is a cornerstone of the visual arts – so artist Mikala Dwyer knew it would be confronting last night when she invited Balletlab dancers to empty their bowels as part of a performance at the Australian Centre for Contemporary Art.
The two-hour act saw the six dancers, masked but naked beneath sheer garments, move around a room in the gallery before sitting on transparent stools and performing – only if they were moved to do so – what is usually one of our most private and rarely discussed daily acts.
 
As a practising artist I take umbrage at the assumption that art has to confront/repel/alienate/disgust. That idea is very, very new in the history of art and is the product of philosophical rather than artistic motivations. A large part of the blame must fall squarely on the establishments 'artist of the 20th Century' Marcel Duchamp; a post modern artist/philosopher before his time and an aesthetic cancer.

The above sort of trash art serves to alienate more and more reasonable people in the 'real' world while feeding into the unfortunate politics of philistinism vs. elitism which inhabits the 'artworld', where the 'emperors clothes' myth holds centre stage. Just read The Painted Word by Tom Wolfe to grab a handle on that reality.

In keeping with our litigationary society I am tempted to sue someone, after all I have been severely insulted and my profession has been traduced by some talentless hack living on government handouts? Oh yes, I forget...I am a white, baby boomer male who paints in a traditional mode...sorry I am one of Western society's new untouchables and therefore unable to sue, complain, or even expect sympathy from the chattering classes who run the arts and media.
In fact if I dared to even speak out publicly on such a thing I would probably end up in jail.
In our case there is no such thing as 'good' publicity.

Zombie apocalypse

If this sounds like an obscene exaggeration to you:
Professor Myles Allen tells the Daily Mail of classic lefty blathertalk:
If you suppose that the annual UN climate talks will save us, forget it. I met a delegate at the last talks in Doha in December who told me he had just watched a two-hour debate that culminated in placing square brackets around a semi-colon.
 
I can tell you from experience that such things are not only possible but are happening as we speak.

I attended a three day Arts conference in Durban some twenty years ago...that's right twenty years...
and I experienced exactly the same inertia. Hours were spent 'debating' over the most trivial of details and in the end ABSOLUTELY NOTHING WAS ACHIEVED.

I experienced the same again in academia after being elected as the lecturers representative to the Academic board of the Institution I worked for. After time wasted on pre-meeting cocktail party rituals the subsequent meetings consisted of trivial 'debates' where a few narcissistic individuals who never seemed to tire of the sound of their own voices rabbited on and on about 'points of order' and how to increase their power/influence/remuneration.  In all the time I attended these meetings nothing was ever achieved until a crisis made decisions inescapable. I resigned because I felt like I was going to explode at the inanity and sheer wastefulness of it all.

I realised that this is why private enterprise for all its human frailties like greed, manipulation and assorted ills, can still achieve so much more than a government bureaucracy even when corporate leaders fall into the traps of a bureaucracy. I experienced deja vu in the form of a company director (who had been an academic) who ran his board in the same way as an academic institution (politics vs. economics).

Needless to say the business was unsuccessful and collapsed, which marks the enormous difference between private enterprise and taxpayer funded bodies, the one dies while the other lurches on like a zombie draining funds and stultifying brains.

The cycle of history

For those who believe that Islamicism is not a threat take heed of these statistics:
Thereligionofpeace.com keeps a monthly list of bloody incidents [of Muslim violence] and during the past 30 days it records 222 incidents, in 25 different countries, including much of the Arab world and North Africa, and Britain, France, Russia, Nigeria, Thailand, the Philippines and China… Seventy per cent of these 222 incidents in the past month took place in four countries - Iraq, Pakistan, Afghanistan and Syria - all battlefields in the ancient religious civil war between Sunni and Shiite Muslims, a civil war more violent now than it has been for decades.
The existence of this violent sectarian schism, and the systemic repression of religious dissent throughout the Muslim world, demolish the absurd claim that Islam is ‘’a religion of peace’’.

Most Muslims are peaceful, like most non-Muslims, but the Koran groans under the weight of its own contradictions, with entreaties to kindness co-existing with exhortations to merciless war. If the Koran were only a text of peace and mercy, tens of thousands of Muslims could not invoke its verses to engage in violence.... Apologists argue that those who use the Koran to justify violence are not Islamic. And in the West there is fearfulness to trigger the belligerent victimology that extreme Muslims use to cloak intransigence, separatism and special-pleading.

The most disturbing aspect of the record of violence of Muslims invoking the name of Islam in violence is that the public record understates, not overstates, the problem. Not included in the log of violent crimes are the outbreaks of civil violence such as the riots that have rocked Stockholm over the past week, where an urban underclass of predominantly Muslim immigrants, refugees and asylum-seekers and their children has erupted in violence, vandalism and attacks on police. You will not find the word ‘’Muslim’’ in media reports. 
And note the fact that the 4th estate's 'useful idiots' are making the problem worse not better with their refusal to face reality, because the Internet has made many of the 'facts' accessible. Unfortunately these 'facts' are not always correct and are often used by other radicals to inflame and exacerbate an already tense situation thus leading to more sectarian violence which in turn leads to revenge attacks and so on ad infinitum until we find ourselves and our country embroiled in a 'civil/tribal war' on numerous fronts, leading to anarchy and a situation where the strongest/most ruthless 'tribe' fronts up and takes control.
Welcome to totalitarian rule folks, and if you think its not possible in the West, just consider how close the Gillard government came to closing down democratic debate and dissension with their 'press reforms', which is the first step into a totalitarian reign, followed closely by violence and mob destruction...the Nazi take-over of Germany in the 1930's is a classic historical model wherein you can view the process.