The cycle of history

For those who believe that Islamicism is not a threat take heed of these statistics:

Thereligionofpeace.com keeps a monthly list of bloody incidents [of Muslim violence] and during the past 30 days it records 222 incidents, in 25 different countries, including much of the Arab world and North Africa, and Britain, France, Russia, Nigeria, Thailand, the Philippines and China… Seventy per cent of these 222 incidents in the past month took place in four countries - Iraq, Pakistan, Afghanistan and Syria - all battlefields in the ancient religious civil war between Sunni and Shiite Muslims, a civil war more violent now than it has been for decades.

The existence of this violent sectarian schism, and the systemic repression of religious dissent throughout the Muslim world, demolish the absurd claim that Islam is ‘’a religion of peace’’.

Most Muslims are peaceful, like most non-Muslims, but the Koran groans under the weight of its own contradictions, with entreaties to kindness co-existing with exhortations to merciless war. If the Koran were only a text of peace and mercy, tens of thousands of Muslims could not invoke its verses to engage in violence.... Apologists argue that those who use the Koran to justify violence are not Islamic. And in the West there is fearfulness to trigger the belligerent victimology that extreme Muslims use to cloak intransigence, separatism and special-pleading.

The most disturbing aspect of the record of violence of Muslims invoking the name of Islam in violence is that the public record understates, not overstates, the problem. Not included in the log of violent crimes are the outbreaks of civil violence such as the riots that have rocked Stockholm over the past week, where an urban underclass of predominantly Muslim immigrants, refugees and asylum-seekers and their children has erupted in violence, vandalism and attacks on police. You will not find the word ‘’Muslim’’ in media reports. 

And note the fact that the 4th estate's 'useful idiots' are making the problem worse not better with their refusal to face reality, because the Internet has made many of the 'facts' accessible. Unfortunately these 'facts' are not always correct and are often used by other radicals to inflame and exacerbate an already tense situation thus leading to more sectarian violence which in turn leads to revenge attacks and so on ad infinitum until we find ourselves and our country embroiled in a 'civil/tribal war' on numerous fronts, leading to anarchy and a situation where the strongest/most ruthless 'tribe' fronts up and takes control.
Welcome to totalitarian rule folks, and if you think its not possible in the West, just consider how close the Gillard government came to closing down democratic debate and dissension with their 'press reforms', which is the first step into a totalitarian reign, followed closely by violence and mob destruction...the Nazi take-over of Germany in the 1930's is a classic historical model wherein you can view the process.