Barack O'phoney

Thomas Sowell on the phony Barack Obama:

Argentina has recently been demanding that Britain return the Falkland Islands, which have been occupied by Britons for nearly two centuries. In 1982, Argentina seized these islands by force, only to have British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher take the islands back by force.

With Argentina today beset by domestic problems, demanding the return of the Falklands is once again a way for Argentina's government to distract the Argentine public's attention from the country's economic and other woes.

Because the Argentines call these islands "the Malvinas," rather than "the Falklands," Barack Obama decided to use the Argentine term. But he referred to them as "the Maldives."

It so happens that the Maldives are thousands of miles away from the Malvinas. The former are in the Indian Ocean, while the latter are in the South Atlantic.

Nor is this the only gross misstatement that President Obama has gotten away with, thanks to the mainstream media, which sees no evil, hears no evil and speaks no evil when it comes to Obama.

The presidential gaffe that struck me when I heard it was Barack Obama's reference to a military corps as a military "corpse." He is obviously a man who is used to sounding off about things he has paid little or no attention to in the past. His mispronunciation of a common military term was especially revealing to someone who was once in the Marine Corps, not Marine "corpse."

Like other truly talented phonies, Barack Obama concentrates his skills on the effect of his words on other people — most of whom do not have the time to become knowledgeable about the things he is talking about. Whether what he says bears any relationship to the facts is politically irrelevant.
 

The last paragraph's instructive and is wonderfully representative of this shallow Alinskyite as it is of Australia's current prime minister (the wizard of oz) who is cut from the same cloth. Both say whatever is necessary to remain in power, they lie to the liars, spin to the spinners and both lie and spin about the truthful and behind all the fabrications they are shallow and superficial.
Superficial persons for a superficial age, perfect!

Wisdom of the ages

In 1837 Daniel Webster recognized the character of manipulative men in power when he said:

There are men, in all ages, who mean to exercise power usefully; but they mean to exercise it. They mean to govern well; but they mean to govern. They promise to be kind masters; but they mean to be masters. They think there need be but little restraint upon themselves. Their notion of the public interest is apt to be quite closely connected with their own exercise of authority. They may not, indeed, always understand their own motives. The love of power may sink too deep in their own hearts even for their own scrutiny, and may pass with themselves for mere patriotism and benevolence.
 

And from Todd Conrad in April of 2013:

 Let us hope that the internet and the free flow of ideas about freedom continue to hamper the planners and world-savers who intend to remake the world in their image and reduce us all under absolute tyranny.

 

Engage politically, the war is on!

The inability to reason through consequences has led many to the belief that the gay marriage agenda is both inevitable and that it is nothing more than a human 'right' that should be accessible to all. I say: wake up and read the writing on the wall. 

If marriage is redefined, believing what virtually every human society once believed about marriage—that it is the union of a man and a woman ordered to procreation and family life—would be seen increasingly as an irrational prejudice that ought to be driven to the margins of culture. The consequences for religious believers are becoming apparent.”

But this is just one case of many. And behind it all, as I already mentioned, is the radicals’ intention to fundamentally transform society. It is not about “equal rights” or “tolerance” and so on. It is about a revolutionary attempt to destroy the West altogether and replace it with an alien and destructive ideology.

Hilary White has just written on this. He speaks about “The revolution of the family: the Marxist roots of ‘homosexualism’.” He discusses British homosexualist Peter Thatchell and a recent article of his: “Tatchell’s Guardian piece was a paean to a document put together in 1971 by what he describes as a collective of ‘anarchists, hippies, leftwingers, feminists, liberals and counter- culturalists’ to bring about ‘a revolution in consciousness’.

“He called the ‘Gay Liberation Front: Manifesto’ ‘a pioneering agenda for social and personal transformation’ that started with the proposal that ‘subverting the supremacy of heterosexual masculinity was the key to genuine liberation.’ Tatchell said it was the book that changed his life.

“The Manifesto sums it all up, Tatchell says, by ‘critiquing’ ‘homophobia, sexism, marriage, the nuclear family, monogamy, the cults of youth and beauty, patriarchy, the gay ghetto and rigid male and female gender roles’ … the whole kaboodle of the sexual revolution.

“The Manifesto itself is quite blunt about identifying the main enemies to defeat: ‘The oppression of gay people starts in the most basic unit of society, the family. Consisting of the man in charge, a slave as his wife, and their children on whom they force themselves as the ideal models. The very form of the family works against homosexuality.’
 

..... His whole article is worth reading, but he finishes with these words: “The main problem with the homosexualist version of the Marxist dream is that you have to get everyone to agree. And I mean everyone. Marxist theorists have always known that utopia will only work if no one is allowed to raise any objection. Everyone has to agree, and no voice of dissent can be tolerated to pop the soap bubble logic of the enterprise.

If you love your family, hold conservative values in the spiritual, economic, and cultural arenas of life then you are a threat to this agenda. Do not think for a moment that because you are silent these wolves will leave-you-be. As soon as they have eradicated all the opposition that precedes you it will then be your turn to bear the malice and by that point there will probably be no one left to fight for you.

This has been said many times and in many different ways, but the truth is beginning to emerge from behind the smokescreen.

WE ARE ENGAGED IN AN ALL OUT WAR.

It is not a war against flesh and blood but its manifestations are of this world and these political machinations indicate the front line. Therefore we cannot sit in the background and indulge our fears we must engage wherever we can and in Australia that means we must vote and vote where it counts.

Do your homework. Access the manifestos of those organisations who masquerade as compassionate and caring but whose political intentions are as vicious and catastrophic as Mao's, Stalin's and Mussolini's were to their respective countries.

I am under no illusions that a liberal government is going to stop this assualt on conservative values because unfortunately many in the LNP are philosophically compromised (as are many Christians), but I believe that a vote for the coalition will slow down the advance, maybe enough to gather our breath and provide more time to spread truth and rebuild the family values that have stood this nation in such good stead.

Unhealthy partnerships

Read Saul Alinsky's 'Rules for Radicals' at: http://www.bestofbeck.com/wp/activism/saul-alinskys-12-rules-for-radicals  and realise that the Labor Party is operating directly from this playbook.

Obama's career and his political campaigns have both been influenced by Alinsky, and where have the Labor crew sourced their political strategy from....even to the point of importing some key strategists (on 457 visa's no less)? You guessed it, from Obama's campaign.

The intriguing part of it all is that Alinsky's book features an interesting dedication on its coverleaf:

"He dedicated his book Rules for Radicals to Lucifer, whom he described as "the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom". In old age he said, "Once I get into hell, I'll start organizing the have-nots over there".
 

Oz Guinness once wrote something to the tune of;  'if you plan on supping with the devil, be sure to bring a long spoon.' 

Applauding his own intended demise.

This is the founder of the organisation that Barack Obama paid tribute to in April of this year.

"But obviously this is a special national conference, because it’s been nearly a hundred years since the first health clinic of what later would become Planned Parenthood opened its doors to women in Brooklyn. And for nearly a century now, one core principle has guided everything all of you do -- that women should be allowed to make their own decisions about their own health. (Applause.) It’s a simple principle." (B.O. April 26, 2013)

..."if there’s one thing the past few years have shown, it's that Planned Parenthood is not going anywhere. It's not going anywhere today. It's not going anywhere tomorrow. (Applause.)"
 

The implicit irony of this stupid statement frankly beggars belief. But then this hopeless moron ends his hapless speech with this gem:

"Thank you, Planned Parenthood. God bless you. God bless America. Thank you."

Well we all know which God he is referring to and it is not YHWH, if anything it is more like Moloch.  (Leviticus 18>which incidentally seems to be relevant to more and more of Western civilisations cultural 'habits')

Zeitgeist

Tales from a female investigator of workplace corruption...sound familiar?

"Over the past 11 years, I have been called upon to investigate many people for workplace misconduct. The hardest people to investigate are high-achieving, high-profile women executives. Their starting position is always a haughty refusal to answer questions or participate in investigations they consider beneath them. Next they attempt to retain control by trying to impose their conditions and time frames on the investigation. They attempt to distract from their own conduct by focusing on the poor conduct of others. Some flail about, claiming the status of bullying or sexism victim.

Towards the end, in the face of overwhelming evidence, where others would walk away in shame, they deny everything and come out fighting. I have had some stand up, in the middle of being dismissed, and stalk out of the room declaring they are too busy for all this as they have a business or hospital or hotel to run."

....or a country?

Even though our Prime Ministership has changed hands, this ‘spirit’ still resides in the halls of power. Imagine this investigator interviewing P Wong, or T Plibersek?

Too right!

This brief excerpt expresses the truth of this current Australian election more eruditely than I could:

Terrifying stuff! Shake in your boots. For the umpteenth time Penny Wong tells us that if the polls are right and the election had been held Tony Abbott would be prime minister. Ms Wong never tires of this horror story and clearly believes it has enormous impact in scaring the pants of us. Why wouldn’t it, she thinks?

---

A dose of a thoroughly decent family man, a volunteer without fanfare for charitable causes, someone with a longstanding commitment to helping Aboriginal communities, who has extensive experience as a minister in the most stable and successful government in memory, and who is an author and Rhodes scholar too boot, and who leads a stable, loyal and experienced team. Now that is all a disconcerting change of pace.

 Ms Wong obviously believes that we have become used to (comfortable with, even) dysfunctional, double-dealing, incompetent spendthrifts running things. Here we all are, she thinks, wallowing in union corruption, seedy deals, deficits and debt, instability and waste, grandiose un-costed visions and thought bubbles, without a care in the world. Mr Abbott would spoil it.