As a sharpening of wits, controversy is often, indeed, of mutual advantage, in order to correct one’s thoughts and awaken new views. But in learning and in mental power both disputants must be tolerably equal. If one of them lacks learning, he will fail to understand the other, as he is not on the same level with his antagonist. If he lacks mental power, he will be embittered, and led into dishonest tricks, and end by being rude.
A last trick is to become personal, insulting, rude, as soon as you perceive that your opponent has the upper hand, and that you are going to come off worst. It consists in passing from the subject of dispute, as from a lost game, to the disputant himself, and in some way attacking his person… But in becoming personal you leave the subject altogether, and turn your attack to his person, by remarks of an offensive and spiteful character. It is an appeal from the virtues of the intellect to the virtues of the body, or to mere animalism. This is a very popular trick, because every one is able to carry it into effect; and so it is of frequent application…
Wednesday, 1 January 2014
The death throes of Warmism
Arthur Schopenhauer in the Art
of Rhetoric describes the kind of abuse that fact-deprived eco-fascists employ as a last ditch defence against the mounting climate evidence. In Schopenhauer's world this tactic is the last of 38 ways to win
an argument when the facts are against you:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment