NO DISSENSION ALLOWED

So you think that same sex marriage is not going to affect you and its all about 'equality' so why not?

Do you really believe that the activists are interested in marriage...the same activists who a mere three years ago spoke out AGAINST marriage as a 'bourgeois institution':

During the discussion, Dow acknowledged that the gay movement's support for same-sex marriage has been a recent development. He added that gays have "gone from quite a radical critique of the whole institution of marriage" to support for same-sex marriage in just 10 years.
And herein lies the problem. Australia is a socially conservative nation. In 2002 the radical Australian-born gay activist Peter Tatchell opposed the very concept of "the nuclear family", depicting it as a bourgeois institution. Yet earlier this year he condemned Prime Minister Julia Gillard and Opposition Leader Tony Abbott for not supporting same-sex marriage. [G Henderson, Sydney Morning Herald]

No; they are interested only in finding a legal wedge to force everyone to adhere to their worldview.

Its has begun with the bakers and will end only when everyone is forced to toe the official line...we will not be allowed to 'believe' anything that differs from 'official' dictates.....welcome to the Brave New World of 1984:

"The Christian owners of a Northern Ireland bakery have lost their appeal against a ruling that their refusal to make a "gay cake" was discriminatory.
Appeal court judges said that, under law, the bakers were not allowed to provide a service only to people who agreed with their religious beliefs.
Two years ago, the family-run firm refused to make a cake iced with the slogan: "Support Gay Marriage".
The order was placed at its Belfast shop by gay rights activist Gareth Lee." [BBC News Northern Ireland]

and..................

The university said the refusal to use gender-neutral pronouns when asked would be discrimination.
“These laws are the first laws that I’ve seen that require people under the threat of legal punishment to employ certain words, to speak a certain way, instead of merely limiting what they’re allowed to say,” Peterson said. “So the law’s put words into our mouths.”  [A. Artuso]