BUM CHUMS

Stupidity is as stupidity does and consequences have a way of biting the bearer of such stupidity on the bum....:

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/blogs/andrew-bolt/sa-power-prices-kill-green-business/news-story/7c256127ad05c1e7333ca1a889b14ab3

BRING IT ON!

Roger Franklin rogers a mythological meme that abounds in Greenie circles; that nature is somehow delicately balanced and that man is the great destroyer of this balance and is therefore a 'virus' that should be eradicated from Gaia's delicate form, a misanthropic myth started a long time ago and was what eventually led Patrick Moore to leave Greenpeace:

He quit Greenpeace in 1986 after 15 years as a co-founder, saying the organisation had become anti-science and anti-human..

I particularly like Franklin's evisceration of the propaganda myth [highlights mine]:

.....learn how, were you to cultivate those trees in greenhouses gassed-up with 800ppm carbon dioxide — twice current atmospheric levels — they won’t do so well, being prey to leaf-eating bugs and hungry koalas. The item concluded, as you might expect, with the plea that much more research is needed. Keep those grants coming!

The curious thing about the ABC’s decision to showcase this particular prophecy of red gum doom is that a prime and undisputed cause of the trees’ woes has been known for quite some time. Alas, the cause and solution aren’t palatable to those who prefer to fret about a trace gas in unworldly concentration, rather than the real damage done by greenish policies that prevent prophylactic burning, thereby promoting both the worst kind of bushfires and insect populations that would otherwise have been suppressed by the drip torch and controlled flames.

More than that, the recognition that man’s thumb exerts a considerable weight on the current ecological scale is anathema to those who promote the myth of “wilderness”, that manifestation of green romanticism which insists large tracts of the bush remain as they were before humans set foot on the continent. Lock up the bush, the eco-zealots insist, and Nature will make everything pristine once more.

The myth is that we should never 'disrupt' mother natures 'natural growth' with seedy mans interventionism. The propagation of this myth led to the devastating fires that have destroyed large swathes of Victoria's and South Australia's wilderness areas and caused multiple deaths in the process. And like the excerpt indicates this has been done in the service of ideology whilst true knowledge has been ignored and/or passed over in favour of the ideologues. Consider this reason why Patrick Moore left the Greenpeace movement[emphasis mine]:

His fellow directors were unqualified in science, whereas he has a PhD in ecology and environmental science. When they decided, against his advice, to campaign to ban chlorine, he split. “I told them, ‘Adding chlorine to drinking water was the biggest advance in the history of public health. Most synthetic pharmaceuticals and medicines are made with chlorine.’ But Greenpeace had drifted away from science and logic, and its tools now were misinformation, sensationalism and fear, all designed to get public donations.”

We 'normal's/deplorables' ought to take note of who the ideologues are who make the plans and petty rules that are destroying all that we love and hold them personally responsible at the next elections.

Let us get rid of this tiny band of fanatics who are destroying everything that has been built over the past two hundred years. These are treasonous worms who in the name of their ideology have caused more misery in the last hundred years than any philosophy since the beginning of time...of course it is Marxism I am referring too and the cultural Marxists of our day who disguise and manipulate this woeful ideology with lying words and false promises.

To apropriate from the lexicon of the anarchists I say

VIVE LE (CONSERVATIVE)REVOLUCION

A NEW BREED OF POLITICAL PARASITE

The new breed of politician (with a very few exceptions) seems to spend most of his/her time submitting bills to parliament that promote fringe issues only.

There have been endless attempts to change abortion into a more merciless and efficient killing policy. Too many bills promoting Euthanasia have been submitted and opposed thus far, but these death seekers will never rest of that I am sure.

We have pollies obsessed with taking away the rights of 'normal's' in voting for changing the marriage policies that have existed for millennia in favour of the latest trends of hipsters and a tiny minority of loud mouthed individuals who have embraced these changes not for what they actually are, but for the power they represent to coerce and manipulate others into their way of thinking.

We see politicians promoting into seats of power those who would hold us accountable for myths of past injustices that never happened and that we are now supposed to pay up for. These are parasites who spend their terms in office dreaming up new and improved methods of leeching from the taxpayers trough.

How many of this new breed of pollies are interested in the massive debt that we are incurring on a daily basis?
How many of this new breed are intent on establishing the rule of justice and of law and order in this land of ours?
How many of these new parasites are interested in making our borders safe from freeloaders and terrorists?

BASHING DEMOCRACY

The attack against everything that has made the West successful has reached another level, an attack on the actual political process. Yes yes I know its been going on for a long while but the number of articles against democracy are increasing exponentially.

Possibly part of the Trump Derangement syndrome.

The 'useful idiots' of the main-stream-media are attacking the very thing that has made our civilisation the most prosperous, successful and the most enduring of free societies that history has ever seen and they are doing it in the belief that 'Democracy' is flawed.

Well hello! what political system isn't flawed? Churchill recognised this as far back as the early part of the last century, but as he so wisely put it;

 "Many forms of Government have been tried, and will be tried in this world of sin and woe. No one pretends that democracy is perfect or all-wise. Indeed it has been said that democracy is the worst form of Government except for all those other forms that have been tried from time to time.…"

But the philosophical white-anters continue. I am not sure whether these people are part of Agenda 21, or if they genuinely believe that Utopia is just around the next worldview corner or whether they are merely cynically jumping on the bandwagon to further their careers, its hard to tell these days.

Here are a few of the articles bashing democracy.

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/6/9/15768314/public-participation-cant-save-american-democracy

http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-kirchick-uk-election-20170609-story.html

DEEP STATE OF DENIAL

I fear Alan Moran's dire warnings are an accurate assessment on the state of the voting public in England. Our Western, JC culture has been successfully white-anted for more than 70 years now in the Gramscian long-march and is, I believe, past the point of no return. 

  "It would be encouraging to fall back on blaming the Conservatives’ poor campaigning and vigorous campaigning by Mr Corbyn. But the more plausible answer is that people voted for those who would provide them more of what they want. One part of this is the amplified government spending and regulatory gifting which has increasingly undermined fiscal policy over the past century. People’s wants, as economists often proclaim, are insatiable, and those wants being met without having to earn them are especially valuable. The mob will flock to politicians who give them things and it will care little about how these gifts came to be afforded – after all, the popular media is full of stories featuring rich people with fancy lifestyles, and there is an assumption that such affluence can be harvested for the gift-receivers without that reaping affecting the size of the magic pudding. In past centuries, revolts of taxpayers against the government acted as a check on its size, but the balance of power has now shifted to the recipients of taxpayers’ wealth.

Another part of the answer may be Mr Corbyn’s softer approach to terror and immigration. From afar this is difficult to comprehend, especially as the London bombings came part way through the campaign. But for many, appeasement is the preferred approach to combatting terror. Like LGBTQIwerty folk for Islam and the US counter-demonstrators who, only this weekend, outnumbered demonstrators against Sharia Law, many feel that if we are less aggressive against Islamic preferences and more understanding of the bombers’ perspective we will see an abatement of the harm they inflict. Supporting this are commentators blaming militant Islamic terror on the West for fighting what are depicted as proxy wars against Islam in Libya, Iraq and Israel. Appeasement is the first step toward capitulation, as painted in the France of Michel Houellebecq’s novel Submission.

I opined that the Brexit and trump phenomena were not signs of reversal but a mere pause on the cliff-side of Lemmingville and recent events have proved that to be true. Even Trump's victory has not been allowed to settle and regain much lost ground but has instead been exposed to an exponentially powerful attack by the silent 'rulers' of America to step up their campaign of scaremongering and seizure of the levers of control. What some of the press call the 'Deep State'.

Once these people have control it is tickets for the freedoms we have enjoyed for the past 150 years and will never be reclaimed, at least until the second coming. So buckle up ladies and gents we are in for a ride.

CLIMATE PONZI IN A BOX

Some ideas just never run out of steam.
Some need an 'intervention' to make them stop.
Some need a revolution.

The Climate change scam is one that earns billions of dollars and prestige for its acolytes, do you really believe that the momentum that has been built up over the past few decades will allow it  to wind down gracefully? At best, like a super tanker that changes course, its momentum will keep it going in the same direction for quite a long time before change is observed.

Meanwhile, will the high priests/esses of this Gaian sect just surrender their perks and status because the 'other side' have succeeded against all odds (and a concerted effort by '97%' of the Main-stream-press) to convince the public that the whole thing was a massive ponzi scheme, I think not.

It brings to mind the Egyptian Priests during the reign of Amenhotep IV (also called Akhenaton) who after being dismissed by the Pharaoh plotted against him and waited in the wings until his untimely death whereupon they came back stronger than ever and ultimately succeeded in destroying the whole country, a fact that has been repeated over and over throughout history and illustrates that these 'elites' are completely unconcerned with the countries they rule but only with the amount of money, prestige and power they can accumulate before it all falls in a heap.

Socialism is another case in point. Do the research and discover who profits......generally the 'high priests' of the ideology.  People without an absolute philosophy have always shown an advanced aptitude for servile surrender to whatever ruling power takes over and the ability to prosper from it.

Australia's irascible 'Poet laureate in exile' (or journalistic bad-boy) Clive James believes that the 'end is nigh', the end that is of the biggest scam in history and that the skeptics have won....I hope he is correct but I sincerely doubt it and I therefore intend to keep on my soapbox until this particular scam is thoroughly, unmistakably, irrevocably defeated or I am in a box:

The best way to kill off the Climate Debate is to do what Team-Alarm has done for years — stop talking about whether it’s real, and just project forwards, detailing the collapse. For twenty years others have been saying “the debate is over”. Now the tables are turning. The debate really is over, skeptics won, and what’s left is to watch it continue to unravel. Clive James argues that it won’t collapse like a house of cards… (an extract from the new IPA book Climate Change: The Facts 2017.)

To take a conspicuous if ludicrous case, Australian climate star Tim Flannery will probably not, of his own free will, shrink back to the position conferred by his original metier, as an expert on the extinction of the giant wombat. He is far more likely to go on being, and wishing to be, one of the mass media’s mobile oracles about climate. While that possibility continues, it will go on being danger­ous to stand between him and a television camera. If the giant wombat could have moved at that speed, it would still be with us.
The mere fact that few of Flannery’s predictions have ever come true need not be enough to discredit him, just as American professor Paul Ehrlich has been left untouched since he predicted that the world would soon run out of copper. In those days, when our current phase of the long discussion about man’s attack on nature was just beginning, he predicted mass death by extreme cold. Lately he predicts mass death by extreme heat. But he has always predicted mass death by extreme something.

[J Nova]

THE LEFT IS THE RIGHT

I could not say it better than Melanie Phillips and shall therefore let her do the talking:

"The red-black-green-Islamic axis
One reason why people find it so difficult to acknowledge the resurgence of antisemitism in the West is that hatred of Jews has been associated with the “far right.” But those who are deeply hostile to Israel are often also deeply hostile to the “far right,” which they believe stands for racism, obscurantism, irrationality and bigotry.

Those left-wingers and liberals who march against Israel and America, denounce the neocons, promote the green agenda and raise the standard of atheistic reason against religious superstition think of themselves as progressive and enlightened. Their Manichean approach means they define themselves in large measure by what they are not. Most people are resolutely un-ideological and recoil from extremist attitudes.
But for those activists within the intelligentsia whose voices are the most shrill, to be on the left, as we have already seen, is to inhabit the sphere of unassailable virtue. Everyone outside it belongs to the party of the damned, otherwise known as “the right”—which quickly shades into the “far right” with scarcely a breath drawn. And “the right” is invested with stupidity, ignorance, prejudice and authoritarianism, so that the left can think of itself as the opposite, waging a principled fight for reason, progress, tolerance and liberty. The left portrays itself historically as fighting heroically against tyranny and fascism.

Except it’s not as simple as that. Indeed, this division is itself ignorant and ahistorical. The fact is that, today as in the past, left and right have common roots and share many characteristics. The idea that one side represents reason and liberty and the other their antithesis is false. In many ways, both left and “far right” form an axis of unreason, anti-modernity and intolerance; and thus they share a number of characteristics with revolutionary Islamism. Indeed, the “reasoned” West has more in common with the “obscurantist” East than people care to recognize.